Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- playground:here [2013/02/01 15:54]
llegodi
+++ playground:here [2021/12/09 16:42] (current)
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 {{:playground:vuvu.png?300|}}
+// Fig1. The vuvuzela simulation.//
 **Carlson White Methodology**
@@ Line 20: / Line 22: @@
 The very same methodology was then followed but with the redshift-distance relation now determined through the use of Ned Wright's cosmology calculator (implemented in the Python programming language). The input data was also switched from a random N-body simulation to a Gadget2 simulation where the canonocal unit cube was of length 250 Mpc/h. The beam was simulated out to redshift 0.6. This was initially due to the lack of a simulation of sufficient size such that it would result in a 4 degree beam at //z = 1//. Cosmological calculations were then done and the results showed that our maximum redshift would be 0.6 and thus a beam width at this redshift is 2.56 degrees (//Θ(z) = 1x(1+z)^2// degrees).
-{{ :playground:004vu.png?200 |}}
+{{:playground:004vu.png?700|}}
+{{:playground:005vu_copy_.png?700|}}
+// Fig2. The vuvuzela simulation for the 250 Mpc/h N-body Gadget2 simulation.//
+{{:playground:006vu.png?700|}}
+// Fig3. The 2.56 degree wide beam (at z = 0.6)//
+{{:playground:vuvuzela0-01.jpg?500 |}}
+// Fig4. The Vuvuzela (at z = 0.6). Here the plot is of xy and z (spatial coordinates)//

wiki.chpc.ac.za